International Journal of Languages and Culture
|
Volume 4, Issue 2, December 2024 | |
Research NoteOpenAccess | |
On the SapirWhorf Hypothesis, Innateness Hypothesis and Semiotics |
|
1Independent Researcher, Pittsburgh, USA. E-mail: penzanceisaac@gmail.com
*Corresponding Author | |
Int.J.Lang. and Cult. 4(2) (2024) 89-91, DOI: https://doi.org/10.51483/IJLC.4.2.2024.89-91 | |
Received: 11/08/2024|Accepted: 30/11/2024|Published: 25/12/2024 |
This article considers a different application of similar methods that have been used to reject the SapirWhorf Hypothesis and expounds the idea as a member of the cumulative proof against the theory. Rather than to explicitly include models of generative grammars, this model instead does not violate the ideas of Optimality Theory – and therein it preserves such qualities as freedom of analysis while retaining the idea of the pertinent constraints. However, it is suggestive of momentary disagreements with the Innateness Hypothesis.
Keywords: SapirWhorf, Linguistics, Semiotics, Cognitivity, Grammar
Full text | Download |
Copyright © SvedbergOpen. All rights reserved